Use of ligase chain reaction and polymerase chain reaction on urine specimens to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic in Singapore.
نویسندگان
چکیده
This study was done to assess the specificity and sensitivity of the DNA amplification assays of ligase chain reaction (LCR) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on urine specimens to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in both male and female patients seen at a sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinic in Singapore, compared with other diagnostic methods currently in use. A total of 100 patients were selected; 50 male patients diagnosed with non-gonococcal urethritis based on symptoms and a positive Gram-stained urethral smear and 50 female asymptomatic sex workers were assessed. Automated assays using LCR and PCR were used, and compared to enzyme immunoassays, chlamydial cell cultures and PCR of urethral and endocervical swab specimens. In male patients, LCR and PCR of urine specimens had sensitivities of 100%, compared to 87.0% for PCR of urethral swab specimen, 82.6% for enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and 91.3% for cell cultures. In female patients, LCR and PCR of urine samples achieved sensitivities of 77.8% and 88.9% respectively, compared with 55.6% for PCR of endocervical swab specimens, 22.2% for EIA and 66.7% for cell cultures. LCR and PCR of urine samples provided higher sensitivity compared to cell cultures, EIA and PCR of urethral and endocervical swab specimens. The use of LCR and PCR on urine as a non-invasive means of detecting chlamydial infections is viable, and may have a role to play in population-based screening programmes.
منابع مشابه
Molecular amplification assays to detect chlamydial infections in urine specimens from high school female students and to monitor the persistence of chlamydial DNA after therapy.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR) were compared for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections by testing urine specimens from 408 high school female students. After therapy, sequential urine specimens were tested to determine persistence of chlamydial DNA in urine. Baseline PCR of cervical specimens was positive in 53 (13.0%) students, and PCR and LCR of ur...
متن کاملUse of polymerase chain reaction on pooled cervical swabs to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female sex workers in Singapore.
INTRODUCTION Infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) is one of the commonest sexually transmitted infections (STI). As there is currently no laboratory in Singapore that offers the chlamydia culture tests, alternative laboratory methods were developed and antigen detection methods such as enzyme immunoassays (EIA) proved to be even less sensitive than cell culture. This stud...
متن کاملComparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
The diagnostic performance of a PCR test (Roche Cobas Amplicor CT/NG Test) and that of a ligase chain reaction (LCR) test (Abbott LCx Chlamydia trachomatis assay) were compared by using endocervical and urethral swab specimen culture as a reference test. First-void urine (FVU) and endocervical and urethral swab specimens were collected from 1,015 unselected patients attending a sexually transmi...
متن کاملComparison of urine, first and second endourethral swabs for PCR based detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male patients.
OBJECTIVES To compare endourethral swabs and urine as diagnostic specimens for the detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), in male patients attending a genitourinary clinic and to assess whether the first endourethral swab used solely for diagnosing gonococcal infection could be used for C trachomatis detection as well. METHODS Two endou...
متن کامل"Does ligase chain reaction assay of urine in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis offer significant improvement over existing diagnostic tests?"--a critical appraisal of the evidence.
Introduction This article sets out a rational, systematic method with which you can assess studies describing new diagnostic tests, and decide whether to incorporate those tests into your clinical practice. Like the first article in this series' it uses a current paper as a working example and draws on guides to reading medical literature that appeared recently in the Jrournal of the American M...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
دوره 28 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999